Respond to a Review

Responses should answer questions and address concerns raised in the review or clarify information about your school. Once we authenticate that you are an official school representative, we will publish your response under the corresponding review. Each review is limited to one response, but you may submit a new response to replace the previous one. Please restrict comments to addressing the content of the review in question and refrain from including advertising/promotional material or unrelated exchanges. Official representatives will have the option to make a contact email available, but please avoid directing users from our site through other means.

Your Name:

E-mail Address:

Phone number:

Bootcamp:

Date of Original Post:

	Reviewer Name	Review Body
	Anonymous	Pros: Rigorous curriculum, full stack is a lot! Especially to someone who does not have background in this field. The boot camp gives students plenty of material to absorb. If one can not totally absorb, then later you have to pick it up yourself! Core teaching staff are good quality and passionate about teaching and learning. Atmosphere is excellent in the academy in general, they have regular happy hours for students and teachers to mingle. And they have lunch hour topics for everyone to discuss topics of diversity, equal treatment, black life matters, etc. Student quality, due to high defer rate, even though they admit a large number of students, the ones that last to the end and never get deferred are s small fraction! These people in my opinion are the good quality software engineers! Especially in terms of learning, they are fast learners and know how to collaborate and get resources themselves. Cons: Too fast paced and if you are not careful you could be deferred even if you are well trained and qualified. So quality of graduates come from the fact that there are intense filtering processes.

Response:

I hereby affirm that I am authorized to provide comments as an official representative for the bootcamp noted above.